Mystery of the Red Panties… Competition

Ladies and Gentlemen, Let me introduce you to the mystery of the red panties. Red panties began on this site as a mention in our New Year’s Post by one of our own, Lu Sid. Well, the legacy continued and there have been several other mentions over the last few months.

Most notably we had some very brave (and beautiful) ladies at the Crush Party sporting Red Panties. Picture evidence below:

red panties charlottesville

Now, it’s your turn.

Crush has sponsored the competition. The winner will get a $25 dollar bottle of wine for free from Gregg @ Crush. Stop by and thank him for sponsoring. Yipee!!!

The rules are: there are no rules.

You must submit a picture to GOSSIP@CVILLAIN.COM (max three pictures per person) of red panties in and around Charlottesville. Picture should be no larger than 500px wide and 500px long.

The picture can be photoshopped, people wearing red panties in real life, guys with red panties on their heads. paintings of red panties, red panties placed in funny locations around town, graffiti red pants, etc.

Use your imagination and try to make things relevant to Charlottesville. No nudity!

We will stick entries into one big thread and let the readers vote on the coolest use of red panties in Charlottesville. Winner gets the wine.

All entries must be submitted no later than March 24th at Midnight! Have fun!

Popularity: 25% [?]

Tagged as: , , , ,

47 Responses to “Mystery of the Red Panties… Competition”

  1. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:31 pmMax Bacon said:

    UVa grad Spitzer’s hooker booker
    I’m sure she had something to do with red panties!

  2. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:36 pmjosh said:

    “The rules are: there are no rules.”

    “No nudity!”

    Make up your mind!

  3. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:39 pmThatGrrl said:

    First rule of red panties competition: no talking about red panties competition.

  4. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:39 pmbelmont yo said:

    Are multiple entries allowed?

  5. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:40 pmThor said:

    B’yo if you want to stick 4 pictures into the same 500×500 thats cool, but let’s do one submission per person? cool?

  6. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:42 pmMax Bacon said:

    The idea of nudity sounds great till the the moobies start hitting the in box-

    “what has been seen cannot be unseen seen without the use of much tequila!”

  7. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:42 pmbelmont yo said:

    No. Not cool.

    I will submit if I must, but I don’t want to.

    I want to uncork the idea machine and decant from the left, diggity?

  8. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:44 pmbelmont yo said:

    Ooooor, I could pick my best for the contest and then flood the comments with non eligible entries.

    Or my head could explode.

  9. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:45 pmThor said:

    Ok, no more than 3 submissions per person? This time we are going to show the pictures without the names of the people.

  10. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:47 pmThor said:

    I don’t care, what do others think is the best way to do it?

  11. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:49 pmbelmont yo said:

    Wait, you did say red pantry, right?

    Cool. Im on it.

    How long do we have?

  12. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:51 pmbelmont yo said:

    Sorry. It helps when one actually reads the article.

    I say three per person. Nudity allowed, but linked and marked NSFW. No names!!!!

  13. 12 Mar 2008 at 4:56 pmMax Bacon said:

    What about a pretty panel of panty perusing participants pick the perfect panty pictures for peeking peeps and perps?

  14. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:20 pmStreet said:

    Ahh, the allure of alliteration.

  15. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:28 pmThor said:

    longest meaningful alliteration (non p words end it) gets eternal fame….

    10 words - Pretty pink panties present precarious platitudes producing perplexed, punished people

  16. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:44 pmStreet said:

    Alliteration articulates an artistic and alacritous approach aimed at annotating and arranging alphabetic accoutrements as alarmingly affective alignments. Alliteration allows aspiring authors abilities above average approaches. Alliterative adroitness accentuates accomplishments (an appealing aspect appalling artistic arrangements attempt abominably). Allowing additional anterior alphanumerics, although adumbrating aesthetic accuracy, affords abortive artistic acuity. Ancient alliterations affirm archeological assertions accrediting archaic artistic alliterative ascendancy. Albeit acutely arduous, alliteration affects antonymous allegory, an absolute actualization alluding asomatous abstruse anima.

    Yes, I stole this, so no eternal fame for me. :P

  17. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:48 pm40 Ounce said:

    Alliterates are anal.

  18. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:56 pmStreet said:

    Alliteration’s adversaries assume absolute alliteration absurd. “After all, any arrant application as abrasive as absolute alliteration assures awkwardness and altercation”, an avid automatic alliteration antagonist alludes.

    Arguments against alliteration:

    -Arguably, alliterative A’s are assonant and aren’t actually authentic.
    -Alliteration arouses absolute amazement amongst asinine associates.
    -Average Americans absolutely abhor any (and all) alliteration.
    -Alligators aren’t alliterators, although alligators are absolutely awesome.

  19. 12 Mar 2008 at 5:59 pm40 Ounce said:

    Street succeeds; sceptics scurry.

  20. 12 Mar 2008 at 6:26 pmStreet said:

    cVillain consciously creates comtemporary contests controlling creative conquests, conspiculously conspiring cohorts continually.

    (if it makes no sense my excuse is that I’m sick.)

  21. 12 Mar 2008 at 6:48 pm40 Ounce said:

    Street sick; syntax suffers.

  22. 12 Mar 2008 at 7:35 pmAlarac said:

    thor’s thread thunders thus thoroughly thrashing thoughtless theses

  23. 12 Mar 2008 at 7:45 pmcolfer said:

    Panties proposed pulled, popping pink posies proffered portentously, puffy pudenda painlessly plied, petted, piping pangs pushed prodded, promised, pellmell positively pulchritudinously poured paradisaically propulsively profound, pasty pallor privately perfervidly pounced purple, pelvic play, patient, purloins passion, prelapsarian peace, peeled pears prone, possibilities pawed.

  24. 12 Mar 2008 at 8:08 pmbelmont yo said:

    pulchritudinously

    Oh come on, now.

    Disco doesn’t dare designate dandiness. Wednesday’s waxings will wow with winsome winding wistfulness. Tables tempt tomorrow’s tappy toes today. Elevate erotically, emotively, elegantly and enmasse with esc at escafé!

    Or not.

  25. 12 Mar 2008 at 8:57 pmMax Bacon said:

    Princess Peppermint proposed pantyless pictures. Pillow persuaded Prince Peter Polvolnich perused Princess Peppermint pouty pertness, pointedly perplexed. Paparazzi Pauper Paul prepared precarious perches previously positioned. Papers purchased Princess’s Peppermint pantyless pictures. Pauper Paul painted Prince Peter’s Porsche purple perhaps postponing punishment permanently. Pardoned Pauper Paul purloined previously prepared papers. Purgatory postponed.

  26. 12 Mar 2008 at 9:21 pmbrutus said:

    Glad to see the photo finally made it online. I suspected this was what was going on down the hall when the girls disappeared with the photographer. (My delicate sensibilities were unable to imagine anything else going on.)

    Only question: what took so long?

    Y’all (in this thread) are a bunch of wordsmithin’ fools.

  27. 13 Mar 2008 at 7:19 amStreet said:

    brutus barks, besmirching boneheads before beckoning beer by barely-bellied babes.

  28. 13 Mar 2008 at 7:54 ambatesville said:

    Lys is in that picture as well

  29. 13 Mar 2008 at 8:08 amThor said:

    THE RULES!

  30. 13 Mar 2008 at 8:10 ambatesville said:

    its on the can in the back

  31. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:07 amUva LaGrape said:

    Why do pictures of Cvillains always have to be of hot girls. Why don’t you ever use pictures of the fuggo Cvillains?

  32. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:09 amStreet said:

    fuggo cVillains? Pffft! There’s no such thing. We are all beautiful. (in our own ways)

  33. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:11 amSilmo Syrup said:

    beauty is in the eye of the beholder, grape.

  34. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:51 amUva LaGrape said:

    even I’m beautiful?

  35. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:56 ambelmont yo said:

    James Blunt thinks so.

  36. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:57 ambelmont yo said:

    He said so. Bluntly.

  37. 13 Mar 2008 at 2:29 pmMax Bacon said:

    Hey, Thor did I win the eternal fame thing yet? Or do I have to wait till the 24th

  38. 13 Mar 2008 at 3:13 pmSilmo Syrup said:

    @34 - Well of course you’re beautiful

  39. 13 Mar 2008 at 4:14 pmStreet said:

    Your panties are beautiful too.

  40. 13 Mar 2008 at 4:28 pmThor said:

    You do, Max. I had to look up perloined to make sure things made sense!

  41. 13 Mar 2008 at 4:36 pmUva LaGrape said:

    no matter what they say?

  42. 13 Mar 2008 at 4:37 pmStreet said:

    If they say you’re not beautiful, they are grossly misinformed. Those stooges.

  43. 13 Mar 2008 at 4:42 pmMax Bacon said:

    Now that I have eternal fame I wonder if it can trade it for a green pub crawl hat on Saturday?

  44. 13 Mar 2008 at 9:41 pmbrutus said:

    @27: I’m not quite sure what you’re saying, Street, but those babes can bring me beer anytime they want. Or… I’d be happy to buy them a beer.

    /glad to see the madness is over

  45. 13 Mar 2008 at 11:18 pmlilith said:

    I’m also just now reading this thread, too. The Lysol can comment, batesville hoo, GENIUS. And b yo, the James Blunt, GENIUS. I am so humbled. That sounds facetious, which sucks, but seriously, you guys make me do my manly belly laugh. Which could have been heard on 106.1 the Corner earlier when Brad played MY SONG (and me requesting it). I love you Corner.

    Speaking of the word “humble,” it took me the longest time to get that it’s “humble,” not “high,” in IMHO. That is so misused.

  46. 14 Mar 2008 at 7:00 amStreet said:

    @44 I’m never quite sure what I mean either, but know that it’s always meant in the nicest way.

  47. […] panties! Don’t forget to submit your red panties pictures/artwork for our contest. Remember you can wine a bottle of wine from […]

Leave a Reply