DailyProgress.com Gets A Design Overhaul

Will they ask you what you think? Who knows.

The DailyProgress launched a new website design sometime last night and I was going through it. I’m not a big fan of flash boxes in the middle of the page, designs that don’t get you to where you want to get quickly. I think the menu items are slightly clearer than before, but the page design forces you to stay on and click through a lot more things. Can anyone say annoying? My favorite newspaper site is WashingtonPost.com which is easy to use and doesn’t annoy you with a bunch of flash.

I’m curious what you think:

What do you think of the new DailyProgress.com design?
View Results

Screenshot after the break..

Daily Progress Home Page Design

Related posts:

  1. Downtown Mall Design Changes
  2. Is the Daily Progress in Trouble?
  3. We Keep Growing and Growing. THANK YOU!
Tagged as: , , , , , ,

41 Responses to “DailyProgress.com Gets A Design Overhaul”

  1. 28 Mar 2008 at 6:56 am
    parlie said:

    not. gud.

  2. 28 Mar 2008 at 7:23 am
    Street said:

    Take one part YouTube, a dash of weather channel, a cup of advertisements, 2 tbsp of bugs, a sprinkling of actual news, put into blender, and set to puree. Put mixture into pan and bake in a slow-loading oven at 420 degrees for 69 minutes. Remove pan from oven, forgetting your oven mitts, and drop on floor while yelling ow! ow! ow! Squeegee resulting spamahol into html bucket and throw away. Order out.

  3. 28 Mar 2008 at 7:33 am
    Elizabeth said:

    I’m voting “marginally better” because I don’t have to click from “Shopping” to “News.” But I’m not a fan of flash. WP.com is a good model.

  4. 28 Mar 2008 at 8:07 am
    lolo said:

    I’m voting marginally better also – slightly annoying. I hate flash and uninvited sound.
    I like the NY Times website – clean.
    If I ever get a minute, I’ll have to share some very interesting conversations I had in Manhattan with some locals a few weeks ago.

  5. 28 Mar 2008 at 8:53 am
    Tuesday said:

    Do people use the site enough to stress over this?

  6. 28 Mar 2008 at 8:55 am
    lolo said:

    who’s stressed? it’s friday.

  7. 28 Mar 2008 at 9:14 am
    belmont yo said:

    I am very stressed.

  8. 28 Mar 2008 at 9:35 am
    lolo said:

    have a prune danish.

  9. 28 Mar 2008 at 10:15 am
    sparky said:

    the site is sooooo slow! too many bells and whistles? guess I will go elsewhere to read about the sniper arrests.

  10. 28 Mar 2008 at 10:19 am
    parlie said:

    but… that’s what the internet is all about! chatting, online grocery shopping, virtual reality, cyberspace, bells, craigslist, sex chat, porn, and whistles!

    I DEMAND SEX WHISTLES.

  11. 28 Mar 2008 at 10:24 am
    Stanley said:

    Not to get all “I majored in political science as an undergrad oh these many years ago” on you, but shouldn’t you break out the worse options the way you break out the better ones? E.g.,

    -Way Worse Than Before
    -Somewhat Worse Than Before
    -Marginally Worse Than Before

  12. 28 Mar 2008 at 10:29 am
    parlie said:

    yes. i majored in something too, and the mandatory “something something research” class taught me kinds of boring shit about keeping your surveys even keel, in the interest of something something something, oh my god, help me, i am so bored.

    stanley is right.

  13. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:05 am
    Stanley said:

    Vindication!

    Oh. Wait. It’s parlie. Crap.

  14. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:07 am
    Gobbler said:

    Yes, parlie is crap…a huge vindicating crap.

  15. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:10 am
    parlie said:

    fuck.

  16. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:17 am
    Stanley said:

    Making-fun-of-parlie-obligations aside—Thor: you should fix the survey options.

  17. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:21 am
    parlie said:

    seriously. if this survey isn’t statistically significant and representative of the internet idiot population at large, then what have we really accomplished here? still nothing? i see.

    i’m fired, aren’t i?

  18. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:24 am
    Stanley said:

    Probability of parlie being funny in this post is, surprisingly, approaching 1.

  19. 28 Mar 2008 at 11:54 am
    Silmo Syrup said:

    Ohhh A good ol’ fashion blood letting. Yes.

    But why Parlie?

  20. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:00 pm
    Stanley said:

    I was just joshing, actually. Insufficient caffeine intake is to blame for any perceived actual harshness.

  21. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:18 pm
    shenanigans said:

    Actually, picking on Parlie is just plain fun.

  22. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:18 pm
    parlie said:

    i am fluent in sarcasmic. you will never defeat me.

  23. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:21 pm
    Smiley said:

    sarcastrator + decider = parlie

  24. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:22 pm
    Smiley said:

    Wait a minute, I’m the decider. I meant:

    sarcastrator + reminder = parlie

    Sorry for confusion.

  25. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:22 pm
    Gobbler said:

    Stanley, please come in and take a seat. We’re all here today because we care about you. We all want you to take a deep look at your life and think about your usage of the word “joshing”.

  26. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:26 pm
    parlie said:

    i forgot about my role as the reminder, thanks smiley.

    i’d just like to remind everybody here that this website is serious fucking business, and i’m sick and tired of all the lollygagging, horseplay, flim-flam, and ballyhoo. but most of all i am fed up with the joshing.

  27. 28 Mar 2008 at 1:28 pm
    Stanley said:

    Stanley, please come in and take a seat. We’re all here today because we care about you. We all want you to take a deep look at your life and think about your usage of the word “joshing”.

    Can I show you on the doll where Josh touched me?

  28. 30 Mar 2008 at 10:57 pm
    DP Dude said:

    In case you guys/gals missed it in all the drinkin’ / shootin’ & hatin’.

  29. 30 Mar 2008 at 11:45 pm
    belmont yo said:

    Missed what… double penetration?

  30. 29 May 2008 at 11:05 pm
    MARY said:

    I WAS WONDERING WHY YOUR FREE CLASSIFIED ADS ARE SO FEW, TO PLACE ONE THRU TREASURE SEEKERS, YOU ARE DARN LUCKY YOU CAN FIQURE OUT HOW TO DO IT.I DON’T CONSIDER MYSELF STUPID, AFTER REPEATED DAYS OF TRYING MY FRUSTRATION LEVEL HAS HEIGHTEN! THOUGHTS FLASH THROUGH MY MIND, MAYBE THE DAILY PROGRESS IS CUTTING OUT FREEBIES, IN AWAY OF CUTTING COST!YOU KNOW THE EXTRA WORK NEEDED,EXTRA INK ETC ETC

  31. 29 May 2008 at 11:16 pm
    MARY said:

    WILL I EVER GET A RESPONSE OR LEFT OUT IN LEFT FIELD WITH THE 29 COMMENTS BEFORE MIND.. YES I DID CALL ON THE PHONE.! NO NEED TO GUESS, YOU KNOW, IT WAS OF NO HELP! I WILL TRY AGAIN TOMORROW, SPEAKING TO YOUR POLITE STAFF, BUT NOT PATIENT ENOUGH TO TALK ME THROUGH EACH STEP.

  32. 30 May 2008 at 7:48 am
    parlie said:

    oh man.

    thor, you want to field this one? or anybody? does anybody want to field this one?

  33. 30 May 2008 at 8:14 am
    Lu Sid said:

    This is definitely a Thor one. Where is he. Get your lazy butt out of bed!

  34. 30 May 2008 at 8:16 am
    echo said:

    parlie, slowly back away. If you pretend it’s not there, it’ll usually go away.

  35. 30 May 2008 at 8:24 am
    dieter said:

    @30 HI MARY- HOW ARE YOU TODAY? I THINK YOU MIGHT BE AT THE WRONG SITE. THE DAILY PROGRESS ARE VILLAINS NOT CVILLAINS. PLEASE GO TO http://www.dailyprogress.com/

    HAVE A GREAT DAY AND THANKS FOR VISITING

  36. 30 May 2008 at 8:37 am
    Lu Sid said:

    I like you dieter, I like you.

  37. 30 May 2008 at 9:31 am
    dieter said:

    @36 I just thought about how I would have wanted my grandmother to be treated.

  38. 30 May 2008 at 9:40 am
    Thor said:

    say what!?

  39. 30 May 2008 at 9:43 am
    Stanley said:

    I think dieter wins my “favorite new commenter” award.

    /wait. Thor: am I allowed to give awards?

  40. 30 May 2008 at 10:08 am
    shenanigans said:

    OMG. That is hilarious. I wish screaming Grandmas would wander on here more often.

Leave a Reply