Goode vs Perriello: JELLO Wrestling!

Here is the video of the advertisement that Perriello has been trying to get the local television stations to remove because it is “libel.”  According to the Perriello campaign’s attorney (in a letter sent to TV stations):

We do not expect you [TV Station] to act as a censor, prejudging all advertisements that are offered to you, but we do expect that when you are confronted with clear proof that a particular advertisement is false, you will refuse to run the advertisement in question. You owe your viewers that much

What, politicians lie about each other?  Who knew?

[via The Hook]

Related posts:

  1. Submit Your Questions for Goode and Perriello!
  2. Tom Perriello Responds to Your Questions, Virgil Goode Does Not
  3. Jello Wrestling @ Outback Lodge? Who Knew…
Tagged as: , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses to “Goode vs Perriello: JELLO Wrestling!”

  1. 30 Sep 2008 at 11:30 am

    The funny thing is the ad made me want to vote for Perriello. It portrays Goode as a homophobic racist.

  2. 30 Sep 2008 at 1:17 pm
    Pink Panther said:

    Thor, you are henceforth not allowed to put “Jello wrestling” in a post about two old dudes.

  3. 30 Sep 2008 at 2:29 pm
    charmed said:

    Pink P, Tom Perriello is, I believe, 35

  4. 30 Sep 2008 at 2:56 pm
    Pink Panther said:

    Ok, that’s not old. Still don’t want to think of him and Goode in a tub of jello though.

  5. 30 Sep 2008 at 4:09 pm
    Alan said:

    I heard a debate from early September between these two, and Goode can’t even pronounce Perriello’s name properly. I’ll vote for the guy who can pronounce his opponent’s name, thanks.

  6. 30 Sep 2008 at 5:20 pm
    orchid said:

    35 is SO old.

  7. 30 Sep 2008 at 6:02 pm
    firefly said:

    @5 well, it’s bugged me all along that goode is pronounced like “food” rather than “good”…or “wood”. what the hell is that about? the e at the end doesn’t change the “oo”. not fond of “virgil” either.

    new to the state, making some snap voting decisions.

  8. 30 Sep 2008 at 7:04 pm
    otterdung said:

    @6
    35 is toooootally decrepit, WTF.
    This town is so full of friggin Peter-Pan complexed 30- and 40-something losers pretending they’re 23. Everyone married thinks they’re single, everyone unmarried thinks they have forever so why not whore around (boys-n-girls); no sense-of-self, no fidelity, no decorousness, no maturity, no dignity, no probity. Pathetic, used-up, baggage-laden, lost… they build nothing.. they fix nothing… they give… nothing: not to each other or for the community. Suck and blow, suck and blow. Barnacle and limpet. Sponge. Parasites and pariahs all.

    35 is fucked, wasted, going down-down-down.

  9. 30 Sep 2008 at 7:25 pm
    colfer said:

    as opposed to what other town?

  10. 30 Sep 2008 at 7:31 pm
    otterdung said:

    point there colfer.

  11. 30 Sep 2008 at 8:41 pm
    otterdung said:

    @9
    then again, i’m thinking IOWA. I bet in Iowa somewhere young men and women fall in love and marry and stay faithful and married and keep their real jobs and dress like grownups and play tennis and enjoy a cocktail on the lawn in white shoes and read a book before bed and a paper over eggs-benedict on sunday mornings. I bet at 35 they all look affluent and hale and clean and well-dressed and thriving… like Kyle. We should all be more like Kyle. Or Darren Hoyt.

    /these meds don’t do shit

  12. 30 Sep 2008 at 10:00 pm
    firefly said:

    nah. not even in iowa.

    /hands otter a free xanax from cvs

  13. 30 Sep 2008 at 10:19 pm
    otterdung said:

    @12
    that’s disappointing. i had high hopes for Davenport.

    /gobbles free xanax and begs for more, though already took four valium an hour ago which didn’t do sh*t.

  14. 02 Oct 2008 at 3:21 pm
    Ethan said:

    Why does this commercial appear to make Perriello look swarthy?

Leave a Reply