Popularity on cVillain Boils Down to Genetics

popular kids
Original members, lurkers and newcomers alike must notice some cVillains get way more attention than others.  Be it posts about them, or other people commenting about them in completely unrelated posts, there is definitely the aspect of an online “it” crowd.  How did it happen?  Researchers from Harvard and UC San Diego have found genetic influence in social networks:

The researchers found that popularity, or the number of times an individual was named as a friend, and the likelihood that those friends know one another, were both strongly heritable. Additionally, location within the network, or the tendency to be at the center or on the edges of the group, was also genetically linked. However, the researchers were surprised to learn that the number of people named as a friend by an individual did not appear to be inherited.

So does this mean that the power of the internet, where fake profiles and anonymity rule, can still leave you with a social-less life? Sadly the answer is yes. Maybelline always said, “Maybe She’s Born With It”, maybe she’s right. I will crawl back into my hole of obscurity now.
[pic from austinanomic on flickr]

Related posts:

  1. Meet cVillain’s Felonious Younger Brother, JuicyCampus
  2. cVillain to sell user data to secret service
  3. So, *I’ve* Decided to Join the Internet…
Tagged as: , ,

45 Responses to “Popularity on cVillain Boils Down to Genetics”

  1. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:10 am
    Atreyu said:

    It’s probably also got something to do with refraining from writing date-rapey posts. There’s a lot less tolerance for woman-hateration on this board/blog then any I’ve ever come across (and man-hateration considering the whole How to Break Hearts thing, now that I think about it).

  2. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:18 am
    shenanigans said:

    Atreyu, who said you could sit at our lunch table?

  3. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:22 am
    belmont yo said:

    Tits or GTFO.

  4. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:25 am
    echo said:

    @3: I believe you mean Tits or GTFO.

  5. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:28 am
    Floozy said:

    Vanillavy is wearing Walmart brand tennis shoes. Let’s point and laff.

  6. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:30 am
    shenanigans said:

    I think popularity on Cvillain boils down to not repeatedly asking where the drugs are, man.

  7. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:30 am
    Atreyu said:

    I quit

  8. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:37 am
    belmont yo said:

    Dont quit Atreyu, we all know there is nothing funny about rape.

    Unless of course, one is being raped by a clown.

  9. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:38 am
    Floozy said:

    Bwahahaha… especially with a spinning bowtie.

  10. 28 Jan 2009 at 11:48 am
    shenanigans said:

    That’s what you get for dressing like a balloon animal.

  11. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:01 pm
    belmont yo said:
  12. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:16 pm
    Thurston said:

    Wonder how many lurkers there are?

  13. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @12 …is a deep subject. You are welcome. For some reason talking about this subject makes me feel like I’m in high school all over again.

    @13 Including regulars who lurk? I think popularity is one of two things here: a prior knowledge of who the person is IRL and a combination of wit and snark.

  14. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:33 pm
    dieter said:

    @8, 9, 10 There is still justice in the world

  15. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:34 pm
    dieter said:

    So according to the article Floozy and Shenanigans are wearing the same genes?

  16. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:35 pm
    Thurston said:

    #14 that clown photo creeps me out. reminds me of that serial killer in Illinois that dressed as a clown and taunted FBI profilers…

    I consider a lurker to be a person that does not ever post just hangs around… I know several of those….

  17. 28 Jan 2009 at 12:40 pm
    belmont yo said:

    @ 15 That is not the clown you’re looking for…

  18. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:09 pm
    echo said:
  19. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:10 pm
    echo said:
  20. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:24 pm

    If my mom says I’m cool, I guess that makes me cool, genetically, right?

  21. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:33 pm
    shenanigans said:

    Floozy WISHES she could fit into my jeans. She’s been eating too many Kalteen bars.

  22. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:44 pm
    Spunktastic said:

    I get the impression that a lot of people that regularly comment on this site actually know each other in real life. Am I wrong?

    I think that would contribute to the inside-joke, always-got-your back mentality that makes many lurkers shy away from actually posting. It also makes the site seem clique-y at times.

    /who’s ready for the revolution?

  23. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:44 pm
    belmont yo said:

    I dont know any of these freaks.

  24. 28 Jan 2009 at 1:45 pm
    echo said:

    I don’t even exist in real life.

  25. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:03 pm
    shenanigans said:

    @23: Thanks to cVillain parties, some of us have met and found common interests, yes. Does that leave some people on the site out? Maybe. Perhaps we need more cVillain events.

  26. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:04 pm
    echo said:

    found common interests

    She means we hate sobriety.

  27. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:12 pm
    Thurston said:

    Echo are you that mad at Lance Armstrong that you still have that cheat to win thing in your name when you post? What’s up with that?

  28. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:12 pm
    orchid said:

    i used to not exist in real life, but now i do, and my real life person doesn’t exist in real life.

    @26 echo, get on that!

  29. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:14 pm
    echo said:

    @28: Cheat to win is one of my life mottoes. I used to have that bracelet, but it broke. I can change it to bear attack victim. People seemed to like that picture.

    @29: Now that I have been reminded soberly, I think I will.

  30. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:21 pm
    orchid said:

    @30 how’d that happen?

  31. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:24 pm
    echo said:

    @31: Richmond

  32. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:26 pm
    orchid said:

    ew, then i don’t suppose i want to know.

  33. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:42 pm
    rhymes with orange said:

    the insiders spend a lot of time hanging out on the site, as well.

  34. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:45 pm
    shenanigans said:

    We all have boring desk jobs.

  35. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:49 pm
    echo said:

    I’m doing work, posting on here and planning a potential cVillain party all at the same time.

  36. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:54 pm
    rhymes with orange said:

    they’re also quite defensive :)

  37. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:57 pm
    echo said:

    I wasn’t trying to be defensive. I was trying to hint at an upcoming party.

  38. 28 Jan 2009 at 2:59 pm
    rhymes with orange said:

    I meant just in general, but you’re showcasing my point beautifully.

  39. 28 Jan 2009 at 3:00 pm
    shenanigans said:

    “I wasn’t trying to be defensive”, he said defensively

  40. 28 Jan 2009 at 3:30 pm
    celylj said:

    i just hope none of you ‘popular’ (now…and online…perhaps) people don’t work for me…

  41. 28 Jan 2009 at 3:37 pm
    shenanigans said:

    Double negative. Haha. That means you do hope it.

  42. 28 Jan 2009 at 4:06 pm
    belmont yo said:

    @ 43 I’ll bet you are a blast at parties.

    When there is work to do, I do it, quite well actually. When there is no work to do, its just me and this here box. Judge not lest ye be judged, oh sucker of innocent fun. Sheesh.

  43. 28 Jan 2009 at 4:06 pm
    belmont yo said:

    @ 41 rather.

  44. 28 Jan 2009 at 9:03 pm
    TwoOFour said:

    @45 quoting myself, -back

  45. 28 Jan 2009 at 9:04 pm
    TwoOFour said:

    really strange echo…

Leave a Reply