Edited for accuracy by Mr. G
And so it happened once upon one dark night in Northern Albemarle County, one woman mesmerized by the tiny dancing letters on the screen, felt compelled to do some inter-knitting googelix search. She was reading and posting much useless commentary on her favorite community blog-o-microcosm, the notorious “cVillain.” That night specifically, the thread called “The Mysterious Female Orgasm” had the many bleary eyed opinionated posting interknitters buzzing.
The waves went high as some cVillain knitters gave quite literate descriptions of methods and used words most often filtered and censored by otherwise hyper sensitive little interknit filters designed to moderate the durrty feelthy perverse words that may blind poor ignorant and unsuspecting interknitting surfers. Somehow the magic and wonders of a full moon lit night let the juicy words slip through the holes in the interknit nets and sparked much dry heaving and a few links made of WIN before the conversation, as usual, settled on the semantics of having the conversation and the appropriateness of the thread. THE REST OF THIS POST IS NOT SAFE FOR WORK!
Amongst the Venus butterflies and orgasmic statistics one lady posted this link: WARNING WARNING not appropriate for people who do not like orgasms, people who have heart disease, women who do not like to lose control to their lover, people who are not in committed relationships and consider each other “Significant Others” as this method will produce massive amount of the bonding chemical known as oxytocin, and may cause bonding between mates for life, not suitable for men who thinks using their girlfriends/wives body are to masturbate with and that should be plenty for her. Do not attempt without proper hydration as this will make her lose vast amounts of fluids and can cause exhaustion and shortness of breath. Please use extreme caution as the subject’s body may be weakened and may need assistance to go to the bathroom and otherwise move about. Reports of delirious happiness and hundreds of reports of general improvement of happiness and life quality reported in this unscientific seven year long study. Recommended for lovers between the ages of 21 and 99.
1. @46 there are many other ways to orgasm. Whilst mining the internets for techniques “O” the-love” I struck GOLD [later revised to platinum, and ultimately diamond status], Hands down (Pun Intended) THE best posted non-clit method. This was posted in 2002 and has grown to a 114 pages of awesomeness. I’d love to hear the first report from a cVillains who tries this URL.
THE LINK: http://forum.literotica.com:81/showthread.php?t=70892
The lady took it upon herself to query some of the cVillains, Friends and acquaintances’ as to the actual effectiveness of the method, and did some investigation on the psychological implications of the exchange of power. In conjunction with reading the recent article, What Woman Want from the New York Times it dawned on her that, one man in Chanuckistan had singlehandedly discovered and unearthed some of the deepest secrets/lost treasures/primal realities of the female sexuality seven years prior to this earth shaking NYT article was released, the tell tale understanding of the psychological triggers of how women gets “turned on” as opposed to “getting off” were neatly infiltrated through the original post(s) and subsequent follow-ups by the author. How could this be possible?…Shaken to her little woman foundation at the revelation she had cum upon; she decided that she would have to go right to the source for clarification, and urhm erh perhaps a few insider notes and techniques for future scientific exploration. Scientific purposes, purely scientific curiosity. Whatever.
A dialog ensued with the author who admitted to spending hours daily responding to questions from fans world wide. He accounted for about half a million reads and over a thousand personal emails either thanking or spanking him for the insight and courtesy of sharing and offered selflessly to answer any queries said lady or any other cVillain might have. So with no further hesitation, the lady decided that the sharing this bounty of female anatomical discovery and delight was a mission she had to accept, and the rest, well is interknitting history. ** [since then 115+ page and a Shout out to cVillains on the last page]
[pic from iwantsome15]
Related posts:
- Mysterious Female Orgasm
- Calling All Bloggers, Please Report to the Internet
- When Writers Review Charlottesville and, in All Probability, Have Never Been Here
Purely scientific!
i figured this out in 8th grade. will gladly demonstrate if you need help.
interesting that you posted this during the stalker issue. i think you are trying to send her a signal; which is “its on!”
the link ‘forum/literotica’ is pretty damn disturbing.
i have Donald L. Hicks’ book Unleashing her g-spot orgasm (Amorata Press, 2006) which although titularly seems to limit itself, principally instructs the same practice as described in that thread/forum. Has same counsel that first time may take 30 minutes; and that if afterwards a partner faints for longer than 20 to 30 seconds, one should get medical attention for her. Ends with an interview with Dr. Beverly Whipple, and includes a long questionnaire that you’re supposed to complete and mail-in to further this general category of research.
The thread is kinda long and has a lot of fluff in it which I wish I could eliminate however all the points mentioned in the Amazon ad are discussed at length in the thread. It also deals with those who cannot achieve this for whatever reason. “But more importantly, it presents a fail-proof plan for achieving G-spot orgasms.” After almost 450,000 reads and 115 pages of feedback I would love to believe that there is a “fail-proof” way of achieving Gspot orgasms however when you’re dealing with women there is one “fail-proof” statement that CAN be made and that’s the fact that they are all a little different and some don’t, some can’t and others would resist the loss of control with every fibre of their being. There is NO “fail-proof” no matter what the so called sexperts claim. The only difference I see is that my thread is SHARING and the rest are all charging $12.95 plus shipping for the privilege of being educated on a subject that damn well should be common knowledge!
I never knew this *wasn’t* common knowledge. I first read about (and about how to manipulate) Dr. Grafenburg’s “spot” when I was in Jr. High.
/”All jocks ever think about is sports. All nerds ever think about is sex” – Revenge of the Nerds
Yeah… I bought a book (subtly titled “The G-Spot”) about it and my Mom found it. She asked what it was about and I told her it was all about acne…hahahahahaha.
Yup – that was the book I read.
I found it on my parents bookshelf, which raises concepts I’d rather not ponder.
OK, so now I feel like I am the most naive person in the world, but when I read this “Try This..” Thread I was surprised that the orgasms described were so different and also I was intrigued by the role reversal where the woman was no longer in control of when she was going to cum. SO that was new to me. I was familiar with the G-spot by reputation.
SO how many women out there have been successful in having, and how many men have been successful in giving these?..
it works fine both sides, but is as someone above said, the process and intent focus on it is a trifle overly ‘premeditated’ and ’scientific’.
moreover, there is no bloody gratitude left in the world, so you may as well just beat her with a hairbrush and hope for the best.
There’s plenty of gratitude left in the world – you’re either sleeping with the wrong people or not doing nearly as a good a job of it as you think you are.
not sleeping with anyone, MiLad; i should have prefaced my comments with “As a purely netral observer…”, but that would’ve sounded like voyeurism. just maintain healthy memories of and interest in the hobby until can gain access to My Intended.
Once you pull it out of your ass, that is
That made no fucking sense 3 comments down. Ugh.
hairbrush bit was an old pop-culture joke. i forget that according to CvilleNews the average age on this site is 19.
Heya Shen!!
Hey hairbrush cornhole!
Since I cant find the FFA, or even the last comment… here is some random headphone hilarity:
http://popmusic.ytmnd.com/
Bwaahaha! Busted cold.
Actually, I’m probably the naive one, assuming the knowledge was common…
When I stumbled on this I too thought I was the last to know. I asked friends. Nobody knew. I got on the net and went to sites and was appalled at the number of women thought they were urinating when they ejaculated which I also found was part of the G-Gasm occasionally. After I posted the technique I got emails from women who had been beaten, divorced and even been subjected to surgery after their husbands had taken them to the doctor with the complaint that ” when she gets really excited she pees all over me. ” I would hazard a guess that in SOME areas of the world. likely far more repressed even than N.A., the response by a man who thinks his wife has peed on him is considerably more violent.
HA! My personal philosophy runs very much along those lines. RAM 30 or 40 MASSIVE orgasms out of her OR turn her over your knee and give her a good spanking, stop every once in a while, get your thumb doing the G thang and give her 10 then go back to abusing her backside. Within a few cycles she doesn’t know what planet she’s on.
omg! i think we have a dominatrix in our midst, welcome!
hehehehehe BRING ON THE PAIN
comment
another comment
there, now shen @ some # is referring to the wrong @26.
Talking about the number in a thread is now so spicy bear 1.0
@16, @17, @18
how odd—these three don’t have REPLY buttons, but all the others in this POST do.
does that mean that the comment THREAD has been shut down?
is ‘cornhole’ deemed to be offensive to corn?
“is ‘cornhole’ deemed to be offensive to corn?”
no, Otter, it’s not. the expression ‘cornhole’ refers to use of elements of corn–the husk presumably and the cob–and so is merely corn-oriented but does not include corn qua corn.
Otter, you’re talking out of your hat.
“the expression ‘cornhole’ refers to use of elements of corn…but does not include corn qua corn.”
I’m inclined to differ. In the expression used by Shen, ‘cornhole’, is hate-criminally slanderous of corn, or more properly maize or maiz. It is a synecdoche, plain and simple.
I am thinking it goes out to four replies, then you can’t reply to replies anymore….we shall see
Maybe five huh?…This system sucks Corn!
shut yer piehole cornholio
that was @ 26. don’t hurt me 2 o 4
come here, smak smak smak
Got some dual personality going on?
Geeez and I thought some of the kiddie sites got hijacked by inane banter. No wonder nobody has a clue about Gspots or what women really need. Bring up an interesting topic on SEX and the best maturity level here seems to feel more comfortable – perhaps more familiar – with CORN, ferfuksake! Wow.
Mr G…Just like we don’t stomp over to YOUR yard and comment on your shitty azaleas, might I respectfully request that you fuck off and play with your prostate until you squirt all over your wilting clematis…. that’s if you can find it…. you wanker.
/inane?cvillain?NEVAR
Floozy…yes why don’t we make it personal so people who come and contribute can see how charming and inclusive “we” are here in Cville, You actually JUST made Mr. G’s point and THEN SOME by responding in a hostile [drunk?] -beyond inane – style, that frankly makes me embarrassed to be a poster here.
FUCK OFF?…Really?….Anyone here find this charming/funny?
Thanks…I McQuit…This is not worth it. Thanks Kyle and everyone @ Cvillain
10-4
I’m not certain that Floozy drinks, or that it would have bearng on her writing. Her comment was pretty consistent with out over-the-top signature irreverent sometimes violent snarkiness. I don’t think MR.G would have been entitled to take Floozy’s remarks personally, and I imagine Floozy would be surprised if he/she did. I hope that MR.G didn’t, and felt the good-humoured and bloody funny ‘attack’ was a sign of welcoming rather than of casting-off.
So sorry to see you go, I’ve enjoyed so many of your posts and comments.
[quote] I don’t think MR.G would have been entitled to take Floozy’s remarks personally, and I imagine Floozy would be surprised if he/she did. I hope that MR.G didn’t, and felt the good-humoured and bloody funny ‘attack’ was a sign of welcoming rather than of casting-off. [/quote]
That’s pretty funny. Justifying it as irreverent snarkiness. Ok. No I didn’t take it personally because I’ve seen it before and know the type of person she must be so although it clearly was directed and personal it did indeed illustrate my point rather than hers. As far as “good humored and bloody funny” now your cliquishness is showing rather any logic. It’d be like meeting you and hoofing you in your clamatis so hard yo momma puked and then finding “good natured humor” in the act. You know bloody well that is exactly what the flooz was doing. What condescending bullshit to suggest it was a welcoming – a college style initiation – and nothing else despite the suggestion to fuck off. I must have misinterpreted that, huh? I don’t think so.
The TRY THIS thread has seen a nice spike in readers. A thousand plus in a little over a day so I’m assuming many of those readers are coming from the cVillain link/article. Once again I’ll point out that I’m simply sharing a technique that many many couples don’t know about and overall the response to their attempts and discovery has been more gratifying than I could ever have imagined. The inane babble I hear from forums like these where what could have been a mature discussion of something you may be an expert in – afterall you have the book – but obviously is still a mystery to many many readers. Instead you have shown to not just your local readers but to global visitors (my reverse link on my thread) what a few of you are really like. Revealing. Pitiful.
Oh and don’t bother waving g’bye just yet.
awwww, shucks. i thought you were down with the whole slappy-feel of this. sorry.
we don’t typically do mature discussion here–not much of it anyhow–unless as parenthetical to the overall antic humor which can usually be ignored by those trying to stay on-track. not patronizing, just defensive of Floozy and hoping to assure you that it was likely not intended to cast you off the site. please DO stay, not that you need my invitation—i’m very occasional here. @4 i tried to help with academic serious input, and @10 with a combination of earnest feedback mixed with snark–trying to maintain the balance. i think we all try to do both.
apologies for seeming to patronize or rationalize. neither here.
Dude, listen up. You caught us in the middle of some silly site changes and we were having a bit of fun. To come back on here and tell us we’re inane and you’re not impressed with us, is fine, but expect that someone will verbally lash back. That is the nature of this site. So sorry we didn’t take your super-serious sex trick super-seriously. That’s not what we do here.
Your man started it
2 0 4 Would you go to a party, and tell a room full of strangers that their banter was inane, they are crap in bed and then swear at them? That’s what your BFF did, and you rush to his defense, climaxing in an Oreo McFlounceOut. Absolutely classic… oh and I really loved the [drunk?] bit… I might have to go hunting through some archives. I seem to remember quite a few posts from you where it looked like you had typed them with your forehead….however now I think about it, you were probably sober at the time.
/ if you reply to this then you lose.
Would you go to a party, and tell a room full of strangers that their banter was inane, they are crap in bed and then swear at them
You mean that’s bad? Whoops.
No YOU lose cause I’ll point out – again – that the site / information was offered genuinely and could have resulted in an interesting discussion. I had heard from 2o4 what an intellectual, friendly pack you were. Instead the thread and the intent gets hijacked by INANE banter. Anybody reading the posts can plainly SEE that.
Out of respect to those people who DON’T know about this I would have hoped those who are only able to post nonsense would have left it alone so the few who were interested didn’t get sidetracked with crap. Would I go to a party and say that? Perhaps if there was a serious discussion going on with a few people, some showed genuine interest in finding out about this and then a few joined the conversation and hijacked it or drowned out the serious discussion with comments similar to what you wrote in the thread. Ya. I probably would have pointed out how rude you were.
Once again I’ll say that this could have been an INFORMATIVE thread with information and relevant comments from a few of you people who claim to have known about this for years. For the people who don’t know about it and would have benefited from all your experience you’ve adequately illustrated how helpful you are.
Corn. Right!
corn cobs, in spite of other uses, have a textured surface and a ‘pleasing’ shape. if soaked in suitable lubricant (and used fresh), they can perform excellent duty as a sexual aid—either with the corn on, or removed from, the cob. Again, a question of textural preference, and your choice of aperature.
the length of the average corn cob is adequate to read Dr. Wangerhammer’s Spot where the vagina begins to curve upward behind which curve is the target-zone herementioned to be manipulated. Though I have ZERO experience of the other entrypoint, one assumes that some gain in pleasure could be got from general manipulation by cob of that area, and in males (to stray from the subject), the cob would no doubt reach unto the prostate causing ejaculation by that alternate means. It is a broad field for experimentation, naturally.
Same and moreover, the use of corn on the cob, or cob devoid of corn, is far more environmentally sensitive than resorting to latex apparati, the which often include batteries which kill the fuck out of the environment. Corn is all-natural, and has so many uses, this being one often overlooked. Eating locally grown corn and then using the cob (otherwise generally useless other than for compost) is an added recycling measure, adn there is nothing to say that, provided as lubricant you use a non-chemical/non-petroleum one such as Wild Yam Extract (available at Rebecca’s or Integral Yoga), then the cob could be used for compost even AFTER it is used for conjugal purposes. There is something so lovely and natural about this, don’t you think, developing a greater bond with the Vegetable World, eschewing costly and planet-damaging latex and battery products, embracing the techniques of certain native/natural cultures of the past, on and on.
To cap it all off, in introducing the ‘cornholing’ note, Shenaigans cleverly and subtly made the post more inclusive and welcoming, as it allowed the discussion to contain pleasure GIVEN to both genders and both orientations—this had been neglected in the original post and ensuing discussion, focused only on the female and her pleasure, and objectifying the male as the service-provider only, also excluding both male and female homosexuals. That was inadvertent on the part of the writer and s/he is immediately forgiven the lapse-omission, I’m sure, but we have to speak truth to power and face problems head-on and not shoot from the hip or any of that stuff.
so, i think we’re serious enough and pretty much on-track, except for these meta-relevent discussions of our site’s inanity or the alleged but not proven ill-will of the commenters, such as Shen who contributes so much and so constantly in serious and substantive ways, while also adding the glimmer of her charm and wit to keep things accessible and light-hearted and … MOST OF ALL … to save dull-ass threads and keep them ROLLING (good for the site, and very generous of her in helping the ego of the initial poster—it stings to post something and not get any comments at all).
pax, pal?
Mr G…It was inane banter because you are new here, and as such you would be wise to watch a while and learn our ways rather than leap in,frothing at the mouth and declaring what a bunch of arse-wipes we are. Everyone else knew we were larking about and are tolerant about such events. It’s called having fun. You should try it sometime when you don’t have your hand up a vagina, poking it’s anterior wall.
What you witnessed yesterday was actually an extremely funny series of identity thefts, committed by 3 people who have contributed enormously to this site over the last 18 months… Belmont Yo, Shenanigans and yes-little old me. This was perhaps confusing to a n00b, but you know what…. it was funny as shit to the 3 of us and since we are not paid entertainers, your disappointment at the intellectual quotient of our discussion is of no consequence whatsoever.
So keep up the quality control complaints about our site… I visited yours and thought it was dryer than a combination of Mother Teresa’s knickers and Gandhi’s sandals but I wouldn’t have even thought of writing anything derogatory because it would have been inappropriate. Our site is anarchic, creative and tangential… if it isn’t to your taste, it’s because it is the pure antithesis of your site…. so do please hang around, I actually find you interesting. But learn some Netiquette, so I don’t have to keep issuing you with a new asshole every day.xx
Outside yours and the author’s, can you please direct me to anyone making a serious comment regarding this thread? Some threads just don’t take off, it happens. I am very sorry if you wanted to have a prurient conversation about g-spots on this here board, but it just seems like its just not happening. I assure you, there are many many active discussions on this topic happening *right now* on these magnificent intarwebs, but this site, it seems, is not one of them. Whether you have arcane orgasmic knowledge to share, or would like to gleen the experience of the masses, its out there, just not here, not right now. I wouldn’t take it so personally myself, but hey, your call.
Digesting your extended metaphor, and scrolling thru the thread, I think you are off just a bit. It is not like a group of cultured adults were musing the mysteries of fluid female orgasms over a nice Pinot Noir whilst stroking their english professor beards, and then some callous brute comes in with his rude interruptions and nonsensical inanity. No. It is rather like the 45 year old english professor has somehow drug his betweeeded elbow patches and beard into a freshmen keg party, where all of the kids are already drunk, and railing a most inebriated version of juvenile sexuality (which, I would argue, is just as healthy and just as fun). Yes, said beardyman could sit there and try to convince the raging hormone perma-boner set of the possibilities of the conversation, the life lessons, the growth… but seriously… at that moment, how far do you think he’d get? Yes. Exactly as far as you have.
I mean no disrespect. I am merely calling it as I see it. Let us now, as a group, simply mourn the passing of the thread that could have been and then return to our anorgasmic tartare umbrage. Or not. Whatevs.
I love 204 but fuck you. Inane banter is what we do. Go away.
really, 204? 5 paragraphs just to say “check out this link on G-spot orgasms?” Actually, with all the beating around the girlbush you did, your post ended up being completely safe for work. We are all adults here. No need to be afraid of using words like vagina, Graffenberg-spot and female ejaculation. Sex is natural. Sex is good. Not everybody does it, but everybody should.
Just a comment or three before I sit back and watch the clique chew off their own tails in faux-intellectualism and deluded sense of whatever it takes to convince themselves all the crap they wrote was “friendly” and clever. Geez. Evidence of very powerful drugs, methinks.
Anyway, I’ll also point out is that Two0Four invited me in and posted my thread in an attempt to SHARE the information with any and all readers of the cVille site who have not discovered the wonders of the GSpot themselves – decades ago. How fucked up is THAT? Imagine somebody NOT charging $12.95 for a simple way to dramatically improve your love life. What kind of deviant would think of posting a link so their so-called “friends” could read and enjoy this too?
Dismissing Two0Four with a sarcastic wave when her INTENT here was obvious shows what a shallow, muddy pond some of you swim in. I wouldn’t be too proud of myself if I were you but I don’t expect you’ll even think twice about how “clever” you portray yourselves to the thousands who read this site and the ones from my thread who have come over to see what kind of people you are. You can wave “buhbye” to them too. They probably won’t drop by and waste their tourist dollars there either.
As more than one have pointed out, some sites are simply not conducive to mature discussion on subjects like this. Fine. I accept that. Not a problem. Posting drivel, calling it “clever” and suggesting I fuck-off and develop some “Netequette” was too much to ignore and the response has just validated any normal person’s perception of their pettiness and level of maturity.
Only my love for 204 is keeping me from telling you where to stick your capital letters and quotation marks.
I’ll just leave this here…
Bahahahaha
Somebody lacks a thrill.
The thrill is gone…
I lub orgasms. Lub lub lub. Orgasm is my Goddess and there is no God. My Queefing Queen reigns supreme. As a lesbisexual, I have been successful at both giving and receiving awegasms. Every female partner I’ve had for more than a one-night stand has been multi-orgasmic and an ejaculator. I don’t think this was all me…they had this power before I knew them. What I have been constantly told though is that I give more attention to the hot sexual areas than their previous partners.
I know the following is not the general pattern, but the women partners I’ve had have been much more reliably orgasmic than the men. I think the plethysmograph article might suggest that it’s easier for women to get physically aroused than men. But mentally aroused may be the reverse. Does this suggest cultural control of the mental half of libido? That mental libido might be more “nurture” than “nature”?
For those who read the article about the plethysmograph: I don’t see it as a big mystery that women in the study were aroused (became wet) at all the sexual stimuli, but didn’t like all the sexual stimuli. A vegetarian may salivate at the scent of frying burgers, but she doesn’t choose to eat them. I salivate at the scent of certain packing peanuts because they smell just like popcorn. But I choose not to eat them cuz I know they won’t taste good. This study was surprising because I thought there were other studies that showed that many men say they were not aroused by gay porn, but the plethysmograph gave the lie to their statements.
then again there’s always the possibility of reading an improving book and doing volunteer work to help the poor, disabled, and disaster-victim…
and relegating these things to the smallest part of one’s thinking and one’s life, perhaps even avoiding ’serious public discussions’ of such matters are by nature and social-design, private…
that one poster above mentioned having cocktail party discussions on the subject is beyond my comprehension for its pseudo-sophisticate public-vulgarity.
there’s the wonderful mocking scene in Annie Hall where at an arts-benefit the shrimp bearded film-producer is going on and on about a movie centered on a guy who “fucks so good” or something like that… Woody’s expression is priceless and apt.
why is there a squidcrab with coral antlers and dried purple semen around its mouth next to all my posts?
It’s actually your G-spot Uva…. and yours looks pissed.
/why is that annoying man still here? Doesn’t he have a whole world of inadequate lovers to convert. I hereby rename him Mr G-sus, the vagina Messiah.
hahahaha. but admire him a little, Floozy–he’s taking heat by crusading for feminist issues. didn’t someone above say he’s a tweedy-bearded-old-UVA-professor? IF SO, his heart is pure, he doesn’t NEED to do this, but he is no-less fervent in his cause-whumping: his nubile students are still going to nail him for better grades whether he pleases them or not.
didn’t someone above say he’s a tweedy-bearded-old-UVA-professor
That was a metaphor, not an accusation, and I never metaphor I didn’t like…
you’re right floozy, my G-spot is pissed…it’s been 26 long hours since I petted her…see ya later.
/turns around Columbo-like
oh, there’s one more thing before I go…
otterdung: loosen up. this is a blog. We’re allowed to talk immaturely about sex but not maturely? We should be glad to take the opportunity in an anonymous forum to talk about sexualities that we’re shy to talk about in public. I appreciate the veil of anonymity, which is why I speak so freely here. Many of you have lost the veil of anonymity in turning cVillain into another Twitter/Facebook. So you get shy talking about these issues because live people know who you are now.
Sex in and of itself is not vulgar. It is not “naughty” or “nasty”. It is natural and real. All the aspects of it, like g-spots and female ejaculation, are natural. Why NOT talk about them? Why NOT glory in sex’s wonder and awesome power? Praise to the Goddess Sex!
are you kidding? are you KID-DING?!
i’m the one who wrote five LONG super-serious paragraphs
on how to better justify and enjoy sticking a corncob up your hoohoo.
Bwaaaaaahahahahahahahaha…. now that’s some funny shit right there.
This whole post makes me think of stuffing a chicken. Ew.
this whole post makes me think of someone stuffing a ewe.
and talking about it at cocktail parties. in a serious and learned manner. stroking a beard.
cursing snarkers and those who find the act or the description inappropriate or distasteful.
this whole post makes me think of someone stuffing a ewe.
You’re welcome otter
Why does the strike html never fucking work here? otter… you can just fucking guess which word I strucked out above.
i can guess and admire. i think nobody else knows the colloquial ’stuffing’, tho’.
[quote] cursing snarkers and those who find the act or the description inappropriate or distasteful. [/quote]
and wondering what sad empty lives some people obviously have when all they can manage to DO is snark despite the fact they have no interest in the topic whatsoever and seem somehow personally insulted that others might actually wish to learn a simple technique that allows some to have exceptionally improved love lives.
Lighten up Francis, if someone on this board found the cure for cancer someone else would snark about it. Sex is suppose to be fun and playful, further this isn’t a sex or woman’ health blog. This blog is a testament to people making fun of things they no nothing about and others who are amused by it.
Seriously have you seen some of the other threads. Plus calling yourself Mr. G and not expecting some snark is kind of tone deaf. Stay here and play and don’t be upset when your ox is gored. It isn’t personal, this is the last row in the back of the classroom. We make fun for the A students who sit on the front row with their hands up- it who we are and what we do.
I’d like to teach you the simple technique of [quote]s.
and wondering what sad empty lives some people obviously have when all they can manage to DO is snark
Only slightly less sad and empty than those self serious who constantly, constantly carp on people who are just having a little fun and killing a little time.
Nothing personal, but your comments sound more “personally insulted” than any others I have ever read on this board. Ever.
Physician, heal thyself.
You’re so right. I always knew the key to happiness was through my vagina.
LOL…nice one D. Don’t you just love it when some twonk comes on here, calls us all a bunch o’ wankers and then hovers around… furtively searching our new comment catacombs for a statement he can malign. It’s like saying to a restaurant “Your food tastes like complete and utter shite” and then ordering a 3 course meal. Twat.
I don’t think most women deserve orgasms. Fuck y’all. Evil. Witchy and that’s why most of my friends are men.
Hahaha…my avatar speaks for itself.
I know you didn’t just question my grammar or phone…back away and quickly you piece of shit. What. This is a very very serious conversation. Less G than F minor. Like La Boheme but not exactly.
L minor?
L. minora
I’m the A student in the front row, btw. Fuck alla yall.
then in class the creepy professor (we did establish that the bearded old guy above is a professor?) is looking down your blouse and everyone else is staring at your arse.
{seriously, tho’, it’s nice of you to keep playing and take all this good-natured joshing good-naturedly.}
Why didn’t somebody tell me before? I thought I’d just discovered this and you guys didn’t even know!
[quote] This blog is a testament to people making fun of things they no nothing about and others who are amused by it. [/quote]