Governor McDonnell Puts More Zoom In Virginia

Governor Bob has managed to fast track a bill which ups the speed limit in rural and low population areas to the big 70.  Both the House & Senate groups signed off on the new legislature with no complaint, and once the bills change houses for final review, they can land on the Governors desk for signature.

Virginia becomes the 33 state to impose 70 as a maximum, with 13 others allowing for up to 75 mph, and a few areas of Texas allowing up to 80.

McDonnell’s statement that “This slight increase in our speed limit will be safe for motorists and help get Virginians to their destinations a little quicker each day” couldn’t be more accurate apparently.  While many (this writer included) equate increased speed with a higher frequency and fatality rate in accidents, the inverse is apparently true.  For the brief period of time during which Montana enacted a no posted maximum speed on certain roads, accidents and fatalities reached record low numbers.  This also appears to hold true along the unlimited stretches of the Autobahn in Germany.

While the speed increase is certainly a step in the right direction, most of the frustration in daily driving situations appears to center around individuals failing to maintain a minimum speed around town.  Perhaps posting, and enforcing, minimum speeds would decrease traffic congestion within the city.  [Info] [Photo Credits]

Related posts:

  1. Speeding Fines in Charlottesville Are 300% More Than the State
  2. Charlottesville Wins Another Top Ten – Zoom Zoom
  3. Are Virginia Tax Payers Subsidizing Bob McDonnell’s Fred Thompson campaigning?
Tagged as: , ,

11 Responses to “Governor McDonnell Puts More Zoom In Virginia”

  1. 04 Feb 2010 at 9:28 am
    Marshall said:

    So, does this mean I just keep going 80 around these parts, or can I edge up to 85 now?

  2. 04 Feb 2010 at 10:00 am
    Blanco Nino said:

    in VA, reckless driving is either (a) driving 20+ mph over the posted speed limit or (b) driving in excess of 80mph regardless of the posted speed limit. so 85mph will still land you a pretty hefty ticket despite the higher limits on some highways.

    also, driving too fast for road conditions will also nab you a reckless charge. e.g. it may be 70mph on some interstates now, but if you do 70mph in a downpour or on icy roads, you may end up with blue lights in your rear-view.

    1. 04 Feb 2010 at 11:06 am
      Marshall said:

      Interesting: I was not aware that over 80 was immediately reckless. With 80 being 15 over the current posted limit, I’ve always felt safe from reckless charges at that speed. Manual VR6 Jetta FTW.

      1. 04 Feb 2010 at 1:51 pm
        oniss said:

        Drove through Virginia in the 55 days. At 69mph. A lovely officer let me know that had I been going 70, it would have been an automatic reckless driving charge. Pretty sure I was going 70 or more. Out of state plates & youth caught me a break, I think. Anyway, the plus 15mph thing has been around for decades.

      2. 04 Feb 2010 at 3:23 pm
        orchid said:

        be careful some bitch in a white nissan murano with a stupid vanity plate doesn’t drive into the driver’s side corner of your jetta’s bumper. it sends the entire hood through the passenger side. and then your lovely jetta is totaled & she’s standing there bitching about a scratch on her bumper.

        1. 04 Feb 2010 at 3:44 pm
          Marshall said:

          Orchid, that was mighty… specific. And a little bitter?

          1. 04 Feb 2010 at 9:08 pm
            orchid said:

            very very very bitter.

    2. 04 Feb 2010 at 12:22 pm
      Ian said:

      I too am wondering if perhaps the “anything over 80″ reckless charge may need to be re-written given current circumstances. It seems inappropriate for a 10 MPH increase to result in the possibility of a reckless driving charge.

      1. 04 Feb 2010 at 1:10 pm
        Donk said:

        “It seems inappropriate for a 10 MPH increase to result in the possibility of a reckless driving charge.”

        I think you mean it sounds ‘lucrative’.

        1. 04 Feb 2010 at 1:13 pm
          Donk said:

          it seems*

          ftw, hangover.

  3. 04 Feb 2010 at 3:55 pm
    Jareth Cutestory said:

    But I-85 is already 70 now, at least from S. Hill to the NC line that I know of.

    So what exactly does the law currently say that they’re trying so feverishly to change?

Leave a Reply